Amidst embarrassing revelations of procedural irregularities and ethics violations, both Ontario’s Housing Minister and his Chief of Staff have resigned in quick succession, while the RCMP ponders launching a formal investigation into their conduct. We explain what happened in Ontario’s Greenbelt privation scandal and why.

The new plan is to “coast”, in the words of Greenpeace Canada, largely on initiatives either begun by the previous provincial Liberal government (i.e., coal-fired power generation phase-out) or mandated by the current federal Liberal government (i.e., carbon pricing).

After attacking Ontario Liberals for their “carbon tax” in 2018, and federal Liberals for their “carbon tax” in 2019, Ford quietly decided that in 2022, he actually wouldn’t mind his own.

The lawsuit alleges Ontario’s provincial government, under the leadership of Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford, violated the s. 7 (life, liberty and security of the person) and s. 15 (equal protection) Charter rights of the plaintiffs and future generations when it cancelled Ontario’s cap and trade program and adopted a new, less-ambitious climate plan as compared with the previous government’s.

On September 21st, 2020, the Canadian federal government accepted Ontario’s Emission Performance Standard (EPS) program as an alternative to the federal output-based pricing system (OBPS) that’s been in effect in the province since January 1st, 2019. Both programs are cap and trade-type emission pricing regimes designed to incentivize industrial polluters (e.g., pulp and paper facilities, base metal smelting facilities, etc.) to lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

As the court wrote in its decision, “[a] government or political party can, in the words of Ontario’s Minister of Energy, “stick it to” another tier of government or political party as a matter of free speech in an election campaign…But a government cannot legislate a requirement that private retailers post a Sticker designed to accomplish that task. The mandatory fuel pump Sticker is an unconstitutional attempt to do just that.”